A court in Panchkula has refused to grant bail to a 19-year-old culprit from Karnal who is accused of sharing sexually explicit material involving minors on social media platforms. The court, while rejecting his second bail plea, observed that such offences strike at the very core of societal values and undermine the safety and dignity of children.
The case has been registered under Section 67-B of the Information Technology Act 2000, which deals with the publication or transmission of sexually explicit content involving children in electronic form. The charges stem from a complaint received earlier this year through a cyber tipline, flagging an Instagram account allegedly distributing objectionable content to multiple users.
During the hearing, the defence argued that the boy had been falsely implicated and had no direct involvement in the alleged activities. It was also submitted that he has been in judicial custody since early February and that the trial may take considerable time, making continued detention unnecessary.
However, the prosecution strongly opposed the plea, highlighting the gravity of the allegations and the possibility that the accused could tamper with digital evidence or influence witnesses if released. Investigators had earlier traced the account to the accused through subscriber detail records and claimed that electronic evidence and seized devices indicated his involvement.
After considering both sides, the court stated that a detailed examination of evidence was not appropriate at this stage but emphasised that the seriousness of the allegations could not be overlooked. It noted that offences of this nature not only harm individual victims but also contribute to a wider ecosystem of exploitation.
The court further observed that protecting children and deterring cyber offences must remain a priority, and therefore, the case does not merit bail at this stage. If convicted, the accused could face up to five years of imprisonment along with a fine, with stricter penalties applicable for repeat offences.
No Comments: