Smartphone Ban in Schools Not Feasible, Says Delhi High Court

New Delhi : The Delhi High Court has ruled that a complete ban on school students using smartphones is neither practical nor desirable. Instead, the court emphasized the need for regulation and monitoring to strike a balance between the advantages and disadvantages of smartphone usage among students. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, who issued the ruling, outlined guiding principles aimed at ensuring responsible smartphone use while mitigating its negative impact on young minds.

The court acknowledged that technological advancements have significantly changed the way students interact with education and communication. It noted that smartphones serve essential purposes, including facilitating coordination between parents and children, ensuring their safety, and providing access to educational resources. However, the court also highlighted the potential downsides of excessive smartphone use, such as increased anxiety, reduced attention spans, and the risk of cyberbullying.

Justice Bhambhani, in his February 28 order, stated, “Much has changed in the past years as regards the use of technology, including for educational and other related purposes. Therefore, a complete ban on the use of smartphones by students attending school is both an undesirable and unworkable approach.” The court suggested that instead of outright prohibition, schools should implement clear policies regulating smartphone use on campus.

The guidelines issued by the court stress the importance of parental and institutional oversight. Schools should establish structured policies that define permissible smartphone usage, including restrictions during class hours and designated areas for using mobile devices. Additionally, the court recommended that students be counseled about the potential hazards of excessive screen time, particularly its correlation with anxiety, decreased concentration, and cyber threats.

The ruling also calls for educational institutions to take a proactive approach by integrating awareness programs into their curriculum. These programs should educate students about digital well-being, responsible internet use, and the long-term effects of screen addiction. The court’s decision aligns with global debates surrounding smartphone policies in schools, as many countries grapple with finding the right balance between accessibility and restriction.

This verdict underscores the judiciary’s recognition of technology as an integral part of modern education while acknowledging the need for safeguarding students from its adverse effects.