Tehran defends Hormuz blockade amid rising global criticism

Tehran, May 12, 2026: Iran has strongly defended its controversial restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz, asserting that its actions were a necessary response to military aggression by the United States and Israel, while also acknowledging concern over the resulting economic strain on nations such as India. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said Tehran was compelled to act in self defense after what it described as unlawful attacks launched through regional military bases.

Baghaei maintained that Iran’s strategic move in the crucial maritime corridor was not intended to harm friendly nations, but rather to counter what Tehran considers direct violations of its sovereignty. He stressed that prior to the conflict escalation, shipping through Hormuz had remained unrestricted, and blamed external military intervention for destabilizing one of the world’s most critical trade routes.

According to Iranian officials, the closure measures were implemented only after the United States and Israel allegedly used Persian Gulf regional infrastructure to launch attacks against Iranian territory. Tehran argues this justified a forceful response under international law, framing its actions as defensive rather than provocative.

Baghaei stated that Iran “had to fight back,” emphasizing that Tehran viewed the Strait as being exploited by adversaries for hostile military purposes. He argued that limiting access became essential to prevent further aggression, despite the broader consequences for global commerce and energy security.

Iran also conveyed regret regarding the hardships caused to India and other energy dependent economies, noting that Tehran does not welcome disruptions impacting major trading partners. However, Iranian authorities insist that Washington and Tel Aviv bear primary responsibility for the resulting crisis.

India, which relies heavily on oil and gas imports passing through Hormuz, has emerged as one of the major economies closely monitoring the situation. Rising shipping uncertainty and supply disruptions have generated concerns over inflationary pressures, fuel security, and industrial costs.

Iran’s statements suggest an effort to preserve diplomatic goodwill with nations like India, even as its military and strategic calculations remain focused on countering perceived Western and Israeli aggression. Tehran appears keen to separate its regional defense posture from its economic relationships with non hostile countries.