Arvind Kejriwal Seeks Judge’s Recusal in Excise Case, Plans to Present Arguments in Delhi High Court

New Delhi: Arvind Kejriwal, chief of the Aam Aadmi Party, has approached the Delhi High Court with a request that a sitting judge step aside from hearing the excise policy case. The development comes ahead of a scheduled hearing where Kejriwal is expected to personally present his arguments.

The recusal request has added a fresh twist to the ongoing legal battle linked to the now-scrapped excise policy, intensifying both legal scrutiny and political reactions.

The matter stems from a petition filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation challenging a lower court’s decision that had cleared Kejriwal, along with several others, of any wrongdoing. Earlier, the high court had granted additional time to the accused to respond to the agency’s appeal, scheduling the next hearing for April 6.

In February, a trial court had ruled that the evidence presented did not establish even a preliminary case against the accused. The judgment also raised concerns about the manner of investigation, calling for action against the officer involved.

Prior to filing the recusal plea, Kejriwal and co-accused had sought a change of bench, expressing doubts about receiving an unbiased hearing. However, that request was turned down by the Chief Justice, allowing the case to remain with the same judge.

The plea for recusal now reflects continued apprehension from the defence regarding the proceedings.

Court Observations and Legal Developments

During earlier hearings, the high court had made initial observations questioning the trial court’s findings, temporarily putting on hold certain directions issued in the earlier verdict. It also asked that related proceedings connected to money laundering be deferred until the appeal is decided.

Meanwhile, the investigating agency has maintained that its findings were based on substantial material, including documents and digital evidence, and has challenged the trial court’s conclusions as flawed.

The move has sparked criticism from the Bharatiya Janata Party, with party leaders questioning Kejriwal’s stance toward the judicial process. BJP representatives argued that repeatedly seeking changes in the bench raises concerns about respect for institutions.

On the other hand, the AAP has defended its position, stating that legal remedies are being pursued within the framework of law.

With the hearing set to take place, all eyes are on the high court’s response to the recusal plea and the arguments that will be presented. The outcome could significantly influence the direction of the high-profile case, which continues to remain at the center of political and legal debate.