“Lawlessness From Courts”: US Vice President Vance Slams Supreme Court Over Tariff Ruling

US Vice President JD Vance has sharply criticised the Supreme Court of the United States after it struck down a set of tariffs, calling the judgment an example of “lawlessness from courts.”

Reacting to the ruling, Vance argued that trade policy falls squarely within the executive and legislative domain, and said the judiciary should not override decisions taken to protect American economic interests. He suggested that such interventions risk undermining the government’s ability to respond effectively to global trade challenges.

The Supreme Court’s decision invalidated the contested tariff measures, holding that the administration had exceeded its statutory authority. The majority opinion emphasised constitutional limits and the separation of powers, asserting that tariff impositions must align strictly with congressional mandates.

Vance, however, framed the verdict as judicial overreach. He maintained that elected branches of government are accountable to voters for economic policy decisions, while courts are not. His remarks have intensified debate over the balance of power between the executive and the judiciary in matters of trade and national interest.

Legal experts note that disputes over tariffs have frequently tested the boundaries of presidential authority, especially when national security or emergency provisions are invoked. The ruling is expected to have significant implications for future trade actions and the scope of executive power.

The administration has not ruled out further legal or legislative steps in response to the judgment, keeping the political and constitutional debate firmly in focus.